Tag: Palestinian rights

Propaganda videos fuel nightmares for families of Israeli hostages

Propaganda videos fuel nightmares for families of Israeli hostages

Beyond the horizon of every hostage photograph is a family that hasn’t given up, a friend holding vigil, a community urging strength against a background of unimaginable loss and sadness.

Hope. That is all they have. Without it the darkness would win, the horror of the past months would engulf them, and so Michal Keshet and her family think of their loved ones held captive by Hamas, and they hope.

“Hope is strength,’’ said the Sydney woman whose 34-year-old nephew Yarden Bibas, his wife Shiri, 32, and two boys Ariel 4, and Kfir, then nine months, the youngest of all the hostages, were abducted from their home in ­Kibbutz Nir Oz on the morning of October 7.

“Hope is the only thing we have. Without it we would be really…’’ Her voice trails off because some things don’t have words.

Beyond the horizon of every hostage photograph is a family that hasn’t given up, a friend holding vigil, a community urging strength against a background of unimaginable loss and sadness.

As they prepare this weekend to mark 100 days since their sons and daughters, mothers and fathers, siblings and loved ones were captured during the Hamas terrorist attacks on southern Israel, families stand united with a single message: we won’t give up.

They shout it from the Gaza border, loudspeakers in hand to help penetrate the maze of tunnels where hostages are believed to be held. “We won’t stop until you’re back home,’’ they yell.

They gather in the Tel Aviv civic space now known as Hostage Square. They meet politicians, do interviews, print flyers and T-shirts, update social media pages, set up family war rooms to glean scraps of information.

There is no complete audit of the murderous rampage of October 7 when about 1200 people were killed and an estimated 240 taken hostage, according to Israeli figures.

More than 100 are still thought to be held but their status is uncertain. Many families of the missing don’t know if their loved one is dead or alive – they’ve spent 100 days suspended in time. Hopes were raised when 105 prisoners, mostly women and children, were released during the seven-day ceasefire late last year, and crushed when negotiations broke down.

Like many others, Yarden Bibas’s family’s strength has been cruelly tested by Hamas’ macabre games.

Ms Keshet cannot bear to watch a propaganda video released of Yarden, apparently filmed as he was informed his wife and babies were dead in Gaza. For this deeply loving father, it was too much. This big, healthy, happy bear of a man now appeared so wasted, so distressed; the video was a type of torture for his family, Ms Keshet said.

Israeli authorities haven’t verified Hamas claims that Shiri and the children were killed in an Israeli air strike and so the family keep hoping, just as they did in the face of earlier claims that the trio had been handed over to another Palestinian militant group.

“Our emotions have been played with in the most horrific ways over the past 100 days,’’ Ms Keshet said. “I don’t know how any human can do that. They’re not human, they’re just monsters.’

The propaganda videos are the worst. They provide proof of life and feed the worst of nightmares.

In the days following October 7, Yarden’s family saw videos of Shiri, terror and confusion in her eyes, cradling her two red-headed babies while surrounded by shouting fighters. A separate video showed Yarden being led away with blood gushing from his head from an apparent hammer blow.

Mother-of-four Ayelet Levy Shachar knows the anguish that comes with these sorts of images. She wrote recently of the widely viewed footage of her daughter being captured. “You have seen the video of my daughter Naama Levy. Everyone has,’’ she said.

“You have seen her dragged by her long brown hair from the back of a Jeep at gunpoint, somewhere in Gaza, her grey sweatpants covered in blood.

“You may have perhaps noticed that her ankles are cut, that she’s barefoot and limping. She is seriously injured. She is frightened. And I, her mother, am helpless in these moments of horror.”

That one video doesn’t represent the life of this sunny 19-year-old who’d always believed in the good of humanity. “I pray that that image, and the experience of what that image represents, of fear and pain, isn’t how she comes to see the world,’’ her mother said.

For Naama’s Sydney-based cousin Zack Shachar the fear and uncertainty of the past 100 days are unlike anything he has experienced.

Released hostages reported that they had seen Naama in Gaza, that she was wounded but could walk and talk. Since those reports, some 50 days ago, they’ve heard no more.

“Think about your daughter or granddaughter for one hour in the hands of these people. Now think about 100 days

“For us it’s a nightmare. We don’t know when she is going to be released or what her conditions are; the hostages that came back told very difficult stories.”

Like Michal Keshet and her family, he tries to cling to hope, and to a plan he made with family in Israel. “We made a promise that they will come to visit us with Naama once she is released. I hope that will happen.”

For Nikki Perzuck, another of Naama’s cousins in faraway Australia, the horror is tinged with shock that too few have responded vehemently to the mass kidnappings. “You would have thought that the whole world would have stopped and said ‘We can’t believe what’s going on.’ There was a little bit of that, and then it just changed very quickly,” she says.

“In other atrocities that have happened to women, all these women’s organisations speak up. Where is the voice for these people who have been kidnapped?”  There are particular fears for the young women still being held.

“They range in age from 18 to 26,’’ Naama’s mother said. “I think of what they, and my Naama, could be subjected to at every ­moment of every day. Each minute is an eternity in hell.’’

Over the past 100 days, Galia Hartman has experienced a lifetime of emotions. What began with an uncertain silence as she and her husband Ronen tried to contact his family in southern Israel on 7 October culminated with the news that 10 relatives had either been murdered or kidnapped.

Amid the mayhem, a small miracle: Ronen’s mother Ruth, an 88-year-old Holocaust survivor, was saved after hiding for 30 hours at the now decimated Kibbutz Be’eri.

In the intervening months, the Melbourne-based Hartmans experienced an even more bewildering array of reactions, from grief for the dead to fear for seven family members, the youngest aged just 3, taken hostage, to joy when six were freed in November.

This included the Hartman’s niece Adi, whose husband Tal Shoham, 38, remains hostage.

“It was on one hand a huge relief, a miracle. Six returned, but one is still there, so the family is not complete,” said Ms Hartman, who has just returned to Australia from Israel after the protracted process of burying three murdered relatives, including Ronen’s beloved brother Avshalom Haran.

“We just want Tal to come back so the family will be complete with the people that are still alive. You can’t start working on the future if Tal is still there.”

Her sentiments are felt across swathes of people whose family members and friends remain captive all these months on. “Every day that they are not freed, the chances for them to be still alive is deteriorating,” says Kibbutz Be’eri resident Hana Brin, who is still waiting for seven members of her decimated community to be released. “We are worried for their lives.”

Medical student Shay Dickmann understands this only too well. Her 39-year-old cousin Carmel Gat, an occupational therapist, was kidnapped while on a family visit to Kibbutz Be’eri on October 7. Carmel’s mother Kinneret was murdered and her brother Alon, his wife Yarden and their three-year-old daughter Geffen were also abducted.

On the drive to Gaza the trio managed to escape under gunfire but Yarden was recaptured while Alon and little Geffen hid in a ditch for more than eight hours before making their way to safety.

For 54 days Yarden was kept under Hamas guard in a house in Gaza before she was released in November and reunited with her husband and daughter. Carmel, however, remains in captivity and the family’s focus is on getting her out. “We wake up every morning with huge hope that today will be the day … we are desperately worried about her,’’ Shay told The Weekend Australian.

She lists her worries for her cousin. “There are so many of them. I’m afraid that she’s hungry. I’m afraid that she’s cold, that someone is hurting her physically, touching her. I’m afraid that she has lost hope, she doesn’t know who from her family is still alive. I’m really afraid that she thinks we have all forgotten about her. She doesn’t know that the world now knows about her and wants her to be released.’’

Her family took heart from news from released hostages that Carmel had been giving other prisoners strength, practising yoga and meditating with them. She was keeping a diary to count the days. “This was the first sign of life from Carmel but also a sign that Carmel is choosing life, she’s using her control over the only thing that is left when freedom is taken, the control of her mind,’’ Shay said

But that information was nearly two months ago. Like others, they wait for updates.

Michal Keshet says that in the absence of any proof confirming the fate of Shiri and her two children, her family have hope even as they worry over her nephew Yarden’s psychological state.

“We believe, we want to believe and we have to believe that they are safe somewhere in there,’’ she said from Israel, where she visited over the summer holidays, cradling a dream that Yarden, Shiri and the boys would be reunited and freed while she was there.

She says that if Kfir is not released in the next few days he will spend his first birthday, January 18, in captivity.

“I want to know that they’ll be home soon, and that everybody’s doing everything in their power, not just Israel but people with influence in the world, to release all the hostages,’’ she said.

“If the world stands behind us, not just feeling sorry for us but taking action … I hope that it will put the right pressure on these monsters to release the hostages. They need to come home now.”

Israel-Hamas war: UN’s grim Gaza forecast as aid halted

Israel-Hamas war: UN’s grim Gaza forecast as aid halted

UN chief Antonio Guterres has warned that Gaza risked an “epic humanitarian disaster” as Israeli military operations around its far-southern city of Rafah effectively halted aid operations.

Earlier this week, Israeli ground troops seized eastern areas of the city, including the Palestinian side of the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and Gaza, but they have yet to enter its main built-up area.

Media witnessed artillery strikes on the city on Friday local time and the Israeli army said operations were continuing in the east of the city.

“On the Gazan side of the Rafah crossing, the troops eliminated several terror cells during close-quarters combat and with an aerial strike,” the military said.

But there was no sign yet of the full-scale assault promised by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu even after US President Joe Biden threatened to halt some arms deliveries if he goes ahead.

“If we have to stand alone, we will stand alone,” Mr Netanyahu said in a statement.

“We are determined and we are united in order to defeat our enemies and those who want to destroy us.”
Mr Netanyahu has said repeatedly that Israel cannot defeat Hamas and extinguish any possibility of the militant group repeating its bloody October 7 attack without sending ground troops into Rafah in search of remaining Hamas fighters.

But Washington has warned that the reputational damage Israel will suffer if it storms a city where an estimated 1.4 civilians are sheltering will far outweigh any possible military gain.

Australia one of 143 countries to support Palestinian bid for full UN membership

Australia one of 143 countries to support Palestinian bid for full UN membership

The UN General Assembly overwhelmingly voted in favour of a resolution recognising Palestinians as qualified to join and recommending the UN Security Council reconsider the matter.
Australia and 142 other members of the General Assembly voted in favour of the resolution, while nine — including the US and Israel — voted against it. Twenty-five members abstained.

The United Nations General Assembly has overwhelmingly backed a Palestinian bid to become a full UN member by recognising it as qualified to join and recommending the UN Security Council reconsider the matter.

The vote by the 193-member General Assembly was a global survey of support for the Palestinian bid to become a full UN member — a move that would effectively recognise a Palestinian state — after the United States vetoed it in the UN Security Council last month
.

The assembly adopted a resolution with 143 votes in favour — including Australia — and nine against — including the US and Israel. Twenty-five countries abstained.
The resolution does not give the Palestinians full UN membership, but simply recognises them as qualified to join.

The resolution “determines that the State of Palestine … should therefore be admitted to membership” and it “recommends that the Security Council reconsider the matter favourably”.

The Palestinian push for full UN membership comes seven months into a war between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas in the Gaza Strip, and as Israel is expanding settlements in the occupied West Bank, which the UN considers to be illegal.

“We want peace, we want freedom,” Palestinian UN Ambassador Riyad Mansour told the assembly before the vote.

“A yes vote is a vote for Palestinian existence, it is not against any state … It is an investment in peace.”

Under the founding UN Charter, membership is open to “peace-loving states” that accept the obligations in that document and are able and willing to carry them out.
Israeli UN Ambassador Gilad Erdan, who spoke after Mansour, accused the assembly of shredding the UN Charter – as he used a small shredder to destroy a copy of the charter while at the lectern.

“Shame on you,” Erdan said.
What does the resolution do for Palestine in the UN?
The General Assembly’s adoption of the resolution grants Palestine the right to seven changes to its status in the UN later this year.

Those include the ability to make statements on behalf of a group, submit proposals and amendments and introduce them, and co-sponsor proposals and amendments, including on behalf of a group.

It also grants them “full and effective participation” in UN conferences and international conferences and meetings convened under the auspices of the General Assembly or other appropriate UN organs.

The Palestinians can also propose items to be included in the provisional agenda of the regular or special sessions, and gives members of the delegation of the State of Palestine the right to be elected as officers in the plenary and the main committees of the General Assembly.
What happens next?
The General Assembly resolution does give the Palestinians some additional rights and privileges from September 2024 — like a seat among the UN members in the assembly hall — but they will not be granted a vote in the body.

The Palestinians are currently a non-member observer state, a de facto recognition of statehood that was granted by the UN General Assembly in 2012.

They are represented at the UN by the Palestinian Authority, which exercises limited self-rule in the West Bank.

An application to become a full UN member first needs to be approved by the 15-member Security Council and then the General Assembly.

If the measure is voted on again by the council it is likely to face the same fate it did in April: a US veto.

Deputy US ambassador to the UN Robert Wood told the General Assembly after the vote that unilateral measures at the UN and on the ground would not advance a two-state solution.

“Our vote does not reflect opposition to Palestinian statehood; we have been very clear that we support it and seek to advance it meaningfully.

Instead, it is an acknowledgement that statehood will only come from a process that involves direct negotiations between the parties,” he said.

Why is Israel competing in Eurovision?

Why is Israel competing in Eurovision?

Key Points

Eurovision is an annual song competition featuring artists from mainly European countries.
Israel first became eligible for Eurovision in 1957 and made its debut in 1973. It has since won four times.
Protesters are calling for Israel to be excluded from the 2024 competition due to its military campaign in Gaza.

More than 10,000 protesters marched through the streets of Sweden’s Malmö
this week to protest Israel’s participation in the 86th annual Eurovision Song Contest.

Organised by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU), Eurovision is an international competition where musicians from dozens of countries perform an original song and competing countries cast votes to determine a winner.

The number of countries competing in the contest has grown over time — but while most participants are typically from Europe, several nations from geographically outside the boundaries of the continent have also competed, including Australia, Morocco and Israel.

This year, a growing chorus of voices has called for Israel to be excluded from the competition over its military campaign in Gaza, which has killed at least 34,900 people and wounded more than 78,500 others since 7 October, according to the health ministry in Gaza.

Israel has bombarded Gaza since Hamas’ 7 October attack in which more than 1,100 people were killed and over 200 hostages taken, according to Israeli authorities.

But how did the Middle Eastern nation come to be included in Europe’s biggest annual song contest in the first place?
Why is Israel included in the competition?
The EBU is an alliance of 113 public media organisations that primarily reside within the European Broadcasting Area: an umbrella of coverage that spans most countries between Iceland, Egypt, Ireland and Azerbaijan. Members are given access to a range of exchangeable content such as exclusive sports rights, news, music and children’s programs.

Israel first became eligible for the Eurovision Song Contest after becoming part of the EBU in 1957, and it made its Eurovision debut in 1973. At the time, it was the first non-European country granted permission to participate in the event.
Since then, Israel has won the contest four times: in 1978, 1979 — when Eurovision was held in Jerusalem — 1998 and 2018. The country also has the record for most participations and most wins in the contest without ever coming last.

Until 2017, Israel was granted access to Eurovision via its public broadcaster, the Israel Broadcasting Authority (IBA), which was a member of the EBU.

From 2018 onwards, the Israeli Public Broadcasting Corporation (KAN) has taken charge of the country’s entries after succeeding the IBA as national broadcaster and representing Israel’s membership in the EBU.
What is Eurovision’s stance?
Eurovision has resisted mounting calls to exclude Israel from the competition, explaining that its governing bodies reviewed the participants for the 2024 contest and agreed KAN met all the competition rules, meaning it would be allowed to participate “as it has for the previous 50 years”.

“As a non-political organization, the EBU’s role is to support public service broadcasters throughout Europe and the Middle East,” Eurovision said, in a statement published to the organisation’s website.
Crowds of fans wave flags from around the world in front of a stage surrounded by lights.
The number of countries competing in Eurovision has grown over time. Source: SBS News / Rolf Klatt for SBS
Organisers also rejected accusations of double standards after disqualifying Russia from the contest in 2022 following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine — claiming that was due to breaches in EBU membership obligations and values.

“The Israel public service broadcaster has been a member of the EBU for over 60 years,” Eurovision said.

“The Russian public service broadcasters had their EBU membership suspended in 2022 due to consistent breaches of membership obligations and the violation of public service media values.”

What has been the response to the protests?
Over 10,000 protesters gathered in Malmö’s main square and marched through the city’s central pedestrian shopping precinct on Thursday as the city hosted the competition’s second semi-final, in which Israel’s entrant Eden Golan performed.

Golan was booed during a rehearsal of her song Hurricane, but ultimately qualified for Saturday’s Grand Final show alongside nine others.

Signs and banners bearing the words “Liberate Palestine”, “EUR legitimises genocide” and “colonialism cannot be washed in pink” could be seen in the crowd. Meanwhile, in a different neighbourhood, about 100 counter-protesters gathered under police protection to express their support for Israel.

Golan said she was “proud to represent my country” and that “nothing will deter” her.

In a video message posted on social media, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wished Golan good luck and said she had “already won” after “successfully contending” what he described as an “ugly wave of antisemitism” in Sweden.

Eurovision, however, said it supported people’s right to peacefully protest.

“The EBU is a firm advocate for freedom of speech and the right for people to express their deeply held views and opinions,” the organisation said on its website.

“We understand that people may wish to make their voices heard and support the right of those who wish to demonstrate peacefully.”

 

Australia supports push to admit Palestine as full United Nations member

Australia supports push to admit Palestine as full United Nations member

Australia has supported Palestine’s bid to become a full member of the United Nations, splitting with our closest allies and defying the warnings of Israeli leaders in a historic vote.

The UN General Assembly on Friday (local time) overwhelmingly backed a resolution that gives Palestine new rights to participate in the body and pushes the UN Security Council to admit it as a full member, essentially recognising Palestinian statehood.

The US voted against the resolution and the UK and Canada abstained. But Australia’s ambassador to the UN James Larsen supported what he described as the “aspiration for full Palestinian membership of the United Nations”.

He said the resolution was “not what we would propose” but that it offered “unwavering support for the two-state solution of Israel and Palestine living side-by-side in peace and security within recognised borders”.

“Like many other countries, our vote for this resolution is not bilateral recognition of Palestinian statehood,” Mr Larsen said.

“Nevertheless, Australia no longer accepts that recognition can only come at the end of the peace process.”

Australia’s vote will spark a furious reaction from Jewish leaders, who had warned the resolution would reward Hamas’s October 7 terrorist attack on Israel and was inconsistent with Australia’s past practices for recognising statehood.

Opposition foreign affairs spokesman Simon Birmingham accused the government of misleading Australians, undermining decades of bipartisan foreign policy support for a negotiated two-state solution, and “advancing the wishes of terrorists”.

“Labor’s support for the resolution sends a shameful message that violence and terrorism get results ahead of negotiation and diplomacy,” he said in a statement.

In dramatic scenes before the vote in New York, Israel’s permanent representative to the UN Gilad Erdan held up a picture of Hamas’s military leader Yahya Sinwar which called him Palestine’s “president”. He then put a copy of the UN charter through a paper shredder.

“Today, I will hold up a mirror for you,” he said.

“You are shredding the UN charter with your own hands … That’s what you’re doing, shredding the UN charter. Shame on you.”

Mr Erdan said the UN was attempting to allow a “terror state … into its ranks” that would be led by the “Hitler of our times”.

Riyad Mansour, Palestine’s representative at the UN, said voting in favour of the resolution was “a vote for Palestinian existence”.

“It is not against any state … It is an investment in peace,” he said.

“We want peace, we want freedom.”

Mr Larsen, in a brief speech on behalf of the Australian government, said the resolution’s support for a two-state solution was a “clear rejection” of Hamas.

“Australia has long believed a two-state solution offers the only hope for breaking the endless cycle of violence and achieving lasting peace,” he said.

“Like many member states, Australia has been frustrated by the lack of progress. There is a role for the international community to build momentum, set expectations that parties resume negotiations for tangible progress, and to support efforts for a political process.”

He called for reform of the Palestinian Authority to lead a future state, as well as direct negotiations “on final status issues including Jerusalem and borders”.

After government sources had suggested Australia could support what it considered to be a “significantly watered down” resolution, Mr Larsen described it as a “modest extension of additional rights” for Palestine at the UN without providing full membership.

US representative Robert Wood told the General Assembly that Palestinian statehood could “only come from a process that involves direct negotiations between the parties”.

“There is no other path that guarantees Israel’s security and future as a democratic Jewish state. There is no other path that guarantees Palestinians can live in peace and with dignity in a state of their own,” he said.

The US used its veto power on the Security Council to block full recognition of a Palestinian state last month, and it is expected to do so again despite the General Assembly resolution.

The vote could also spark moves in Washington DC to cut off funding to the UN, because under US law, UN organisations cannot be funded if they grant full membership to groups that do not have “internationally recognised attributes” of statehood.

From Ben-Gvir’s Paramilitaries to IDF ‘Policing’ | Israel’s Alarming Security Plans Could Inflame Relations With Its Arab Citizens

From Ben-Gvir’s Paramilitaries to IDF ‘Policing’ | Israel’s Alarming Security Plans Could Inflame Relations With Its Arab Citizens

Segalovitz fears that Israeli Arabs will see the plan as “a militarization of their relationship with the state.” And he warned that if soldiers used live fire against Israeli Arabs during riots inside Israel, it would be an extremely grave turning point in the state’s relations with the Arab community.

Analysis | Israel’s Government Is a Clear and Present Danger for Its Arab Palestinian Citizens

Analysis | Israel’s Government Is a Clear and Present Danger for Its Arab Palestinian Citizens

The new law provided the right of self-determination in Israel to Jews exclusively, demoted the Arabic language and committed to Jewish settlement. Many Arab Palestinian citizens were downright scared; anxious that the Nation State law wasn’t just a culmination of anti-Arab populist hostility, but the ominous start of a new assault.

Israel Bans Young Palestinians From Entering the Country for ‘Peace-building’ Meetups

Israel Bans Young Palestinians From Entering the Country for ‘Peace-building’ Meetups

The Israeli institution that oversees the West Bank is prohibiting Palestinians under the age of 22 from entering Israel to participate in organized peace-building activities. The new policy is expected to hamper the efforts of organizations which, among other goals, seek to foster encounters between Palestinian and Israeli youth.

UN seeks court opinion on ‘violation’ of Palestinian rights

UN seeks court opinion on ‘violation’ of Palestinian rights

Palestinians are welcoming a vote by the United Nations General Assembly to ask the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for an opinion on the legal consequences of Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territories.

“The time has come for Israel to be a state subject to law, and to be held accountable for its ongoing crimes against our people,” said Nabil Abu Rudeineh, spokesman for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.

Senior Palestinian official Hussein al-Sheikh said on Twitter that Friday’s vote “reflects the victory of Palestinian diplomacy”.

While the court’s rulings are not binding, they influence international opinion.

It last addressed the conflict in 2004, when the assembly asked it to consider the legality of an Israeli-built separation barrier.

Palestinian Ambassador Riyad Mansour thanked countries that backed the measure.

“We trust that regardless of your vote today, if you believe in international law and peace, you will uphold the opinion of the International Court of Justice, when delivered,” Mr Mansour said, going on to urge countries to “stand up” to Israel’s new, hard-line government.

Israel didn’t speak at the assembly, which voted during the Jewish Sabbath.

In a written statement beforehand, Ambassador Gilad Erdan called the measure “outrageous,” the UN “morally bankrupt and politicised” and any potential decision from the court “completely illegitimate”.

Conflict history

Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war.

The Palestinians seek all three areas for an independent state.

Israel considers the West Bank to be disputed territory and has built dozens of settlements that are now home to roughly 500,000 Jewish settlers.

It also has annexed east Jerusalem and considers the entire city to be its capital.

An additional 200,000 Israelis live in settlements built in east Jerusalem that Israel considers to be neighbourhoods of its capital.

Palestinian residents of the city face systematic discrimination, making it difficult for them to build new homes or expand existing ones.

The international community overwhelmingly considers the settlements to be illegal.

Israel’s annexation of east Jerusalem, home to the city’s most sensitive holy sites, also is not internationally recognised.

Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005.

Two years later, the Hamas militant group seized control of the territory from the forces of internationally recognised President Mahmoud Abbas.

Friday’s resolution asked the International Court of Justice to look at the legal consequences of Israeli measures, which it said are “aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem”.

It also asks for an opinion on how all Israeli policies affect the legal status of its occupation, “and what are the legal consequences that arise for all states and the United Nations from this status”.

Lobbying for the vote

The vote was 87-26, with 53 abstentions.

It followed approvals of the draft resolution in the assembly’s budget committee earlier on Friday and in the Special Political and Decolonisation Committee on November 11.

Israel carried out widespread behind-the-scenes lobbying efforts against the measure and decried the assembly for voting after the Sabbath began on Friday evening.

Ahead of the vote, outgoing Prime Minister Yair Lapid personally contacted about 60 world leaders, while figurehead President Isaac Herzog spoke to many counterparts, according to an Israeli diplomatic official who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing private diplomatic efforts.

The United Nations has a long history of passing resolutions critical of Israel, and Israel and the US accuse the world body of being unfairly biased.

Israel has accused the Palestinians, who have non-member observer state status at the United Nations, of trying to use the UN to circumvent peace negotiations and impose a settlement.

The Palestinians say that Israeli officials, especially incoming Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, are not serious about seeking peace as they continue to expand settlements on occupied lands.

The last round of substantive peace talks broke down in 2009.

Before the November 11 committee vote, Mr Erdan told UN diplomats that approving the resolution would destroy “any hope for reconciliation” with the Palestinians and perpetuate the conflict.

He warned that involving the court “in a decades-old conflict only to dictate one side’s demands on the other ensures many more years of stagnation” and give the Palestinians “the perfect excuse to continue boycotting the negotiating table to perpetuate the conflict”.

After that committee vote, Mr Mansour said “our people are entitled to freedom,” stressing that “nothing justifies standing with Israeli occupation and annexation, its displacement and dispossession of our people”.

The court is expected to solicit opinions from dozens of countries before issuing its opinion months from now.

Israel has not said whether it will cooperate.

Previous international attempts to resolve conflict

It is not the first time the world court has been asked to weigh in on the conflict.

In 2004, the court said that a separation barrier Israel built was “contrary to international law” and called on Israel to immediately halt construction.

Israel has said the barrier is a security measure meant to prevent Palestinian attackers from reaching Israeli cities.

The Palestinians say the structure is an Israeli land grab because of its route through east Jerusalem and parts of the West Bank.

Israel has ignored the 2004 ruling, and Friday’s resolution demands that Israel comply with it, stop construction of the wall and dismantle it.

It says Israel should also make reparations for all damage caused by the wall’s construction, “which has gravely impacted the human rights” and living conditions of Palestinians.

The request for the court’s advisory opinion is part of a wide-ranging resolution titled, Israeli practices and settlement activities affecting the rights of the Palestinian people and other Arabs of the occupied territories.

Theme: Overlay by Kaira