Tag: Israeli protests

Israeli protesters are calling for democracy. But what about the occupation of Palestinians?

Israeli protesters are calling for democracy. But what about the occupation of Palestinians?

JERUSALEM (AP) — Israel is being rocked by a wave of mass protests calling for the country’s democracy to be upheld. But the pro-democracy movement lacks any clear message of opposition to Israel’s open-ended military rule over millions of Palestinians.
This contradiction reflects a widely held belief among Jewish Israelis that the conflict with the Palestinians is both intractable and somehow separate from Israel’s internal strife.
Critics of the protest movement, including Palestinians, say this is a significant blind spot and that such selective advocacy of democratic ideals shows how disconnected Israelis are from the harsh reality of those living under Israel’s occupation.
“It’s so ironic that they’re talking and protesting for democracy while at the same time it’s been a dictatorship for Palestinians for 75 years,” said Diana Buttu, a Palestinian commentator. “They’re afraid that their own privileges and rights are going to somehow be affected, but they won’t make the connection” with the occupation.
The protesters are demonstrating against the drive of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to weaken the judiciary by limiting judicial oversight on official decision-making and legislation.
The protest movement says its limited message against the judicial overhaul is holding together one of the largest and most sustained protest movements Israel has ever seen, bringing tens of thousands of people to the streets for the last 30 weeks.
Netanyahu’s government, made up of ultranationalist and ultra-religious parties with close ties to the West Bank settler movement, says the overhaul will restore power to elected lawmakers and rein in what it says is an overly interventionist judicial system.
Critics see the legislative push, especially because it’s driven by far-right and conservative religious parties, as an assault on Israel’s democratic fundamentals and its weak system of checks and balances. They say it will open the door to serious infringements on personal liberties and the rights of women, the LGBTQ+ community and minorities that will set Israel on a path toward autocracy.
The protesters come from a wide swath of Israeli society. They chant “democracy or rebellion!” carry signs reading “Israel will remain a democracy,” and have unfurled a giant copy of the country’s declaration of independence, which serves as an unofficial bill of rights, at various events.

But largely missing from the raucous protests is any meaningful reference to Israel’s 56-year occupation of lands the Palestinians seek for their future state. A small contingent of activists waving Palestinian flags have taken part, but remain mostly on the fringe.
In some cases, they have even been ostracized by organizers who feared that mentioning the occupation would somehow undercut the protest movement. Israel’s Palestinian citizens, who make up a fifth of the population, have sat out the protests in part because the demonstrations are ignoring the occupation.
“The protest is against the reduction of the democratic space for Jews. Most Jews in Israel don’t have a problem with Israel enforcing an apartheid regime in the West Bank,” said Dror Etkes, a veteran anti-occupation activist.
Despite his concerns, Etkes has made a point of participating in the protests. He sees the absence of occupation-related themes as a strategy meant to unite disparate groups against a more imminent threat. He said that if the government has its way, “people like me won’t be able to protest” against the occupation.
The Associated Press contacted several protest leaders who either declined to comment or did not respond to questions about the contradictions.
Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, territories the Palestinians seek for their hoped-for independent state, in the 1967 Mideast war. Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip in 2005 and, along with Egypt, enforces a blockade on the territory. More than 700,000 settlers now live in the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
Palestinians in the West Bank live under limited autonomous self-rule, but Israel controls major parts of their lives, including movement and travel, construction permits in certain areas and significant parts of the economy. Israel’s military also frequently targets Palestinian areas in what it says is a bid to thwart militancy.
A two-tier legal system is also in place in the West Bank, where large parts of Israeli law apply to Jewish settlers and Palestinians are subject to Israeli military law. Palestinians cannot vote in Israeli elections. Their own leadership, established as part of interim peace agreements in the 1990s, has repeatedly delayed Palestinian elections.
While Palestinians in east Jerusalem hold Israeli residency and have access to certain social benefits, they face widespread discrimination. They can apply for citizenship but many choose not to, either on ideological grounds or because the process is too bureaucratic.
Those contrasting realities have prompted rights groups to say an apartheid system has taken root. Israel vehemently denies such claims. It says the West Bank is disputed territory whose fate should be determined through negotiations, which are long moribund.
After years of deadly conflict with the Palestinians, many Jewish Israelis see the occupation as the inevitable by-product of a hopeless security situation. Others accuse the Palestinians of rejecting generous peace offers — a claim the Palestinians reject.

That frame of mind has prevented many Israeli demonstrators from grasping the contradiction in their struggle, said Amichai Cohen, a senior fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute, a Jerusalem think tank.
But he and others say the occupation is seeping into the protests, presenting a potential opening for an awakening. For one, the main backers of the legal overhaul are firebrand West Bank settlers who seek to expand and solidify Israel’s domination over the Palestinian territories in part by weakening the court’s oversight over its moves.
The protests have also coincided with a spike in Israeli-Palestinian fighting, during which radical settlers have attacked Palestinian towns, most notably Hawara, setting cars and homes ablaze with a paltry response from Israeli security forces. The prominent protest chant “Where were you in Hawara?” emerged as a cry against perceived police brutality against protesters.
Avner Gvaryahu, who heads Breaking the Silence, a whistleblower group of former soldiers, is a constant presence at the protests.
He has watched in frustration as military reservists have refused to continue serving to protest what they say is the disintegration of Israel’s democracy, but kept silent over the occupation.
Still, the reservist protest has shattered a taboo against military refusal, a tool he said might be used in the future by soldiers against the occupation.
“The mainstream is waking up,” he said.
Palestinians remain skeptical.
Shawan Jabarin, head of the Palestinian rights group Al-Haq, said he considers the protests an internal Israeli struggle to maintain a status quo that has only cemented the occupation.
“What democracy are you speaking about?’” he said. “Democracy doesn’t go in the same time with occupation.”

Israeli protests cast light on laws discriminating against Palestinians

Israeli protests cast light on laws discriminating against Palestinians

The passing of a bill this week by the Israeli parliament, or Knesset, restricting the Supreme Court’s powers has garnered domestic opposition and even international calls for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his far-right government to reconsider.

The push for the bill, months in the making, has brought out thousands of Israelis to the streets, with the country’s opposition rallying around a call to “protect democracy”, and maintaining that the present government and its control of the Knesset mark a departure from the norms of Israeli parliamentary democracy.

Palestinians, watching on, may have a different opinion. Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories rarely, if ever, receives censure in the Knesset. Instead, many bills are passed – relatively unnoticed – that continue to subjugate and discriminate against Palestinian citizens of Israel, as well as those living in occupied East Jerusalem, the occupied West Bank and the blockaded Gaza Strip.

Sari Bashi, programme director at Human Rights Watch, said Israeli law codifies racial discrimination against Palestinian citizens of Israel, and facilitates institutional privilege of Israeli Jews over Palestinians.

“I respect the pro-democracy protestors engaging in mass demonstrations against the further erosion of judicial independence in Israel, and many are also protesting Israeli occupation and apartheid. But let’s please be clear about the Israeli ‘democracy’ they are trying to protect,” she tweeted.

Here are just some of the laws Israel has passed in recent years that experts have said codify discrimination against Palestinians and restrict their rights but that have not met the same public uproar:

Expansion of the Admissions Committees Law

On Tuesday, the Knesset expanded a 2010 law that allows communities to screen and reject applicants deemed “unsuitable to the[ir] social and cultural makeup”. This, observers have said, essentially maked it easier for towns to prevent Palestinian citizens of Israel from moving to Jewish-majority towns. Many of these towns were built on or near Palestinian towns and villages that were depopulated before or during the 1948 Nakba, after their inhabitants were expelled or fled.

“The passage of the ‘Admissions Committees’ law in the Knesset yesterday, which effectively authorises segregation in Israeli towns, is but the latest reminder that principles of democracy and equality have been absent in Israel long before this most recent judicial overhaul,” said Yousef Munayyer, a senior fellow at the Arab Center in Washington, D.C.

“From NGO laws targeting human rights organisations, laws around Palestinian family unification, laws around the right to boycott and laws around the right to commemorate Palestinian history, the assault on liberal principles in Israel has been a very long road, which was paved by some of the same political figures screaming about democracy today,” Munayyer told Al Jazeera.

Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People

In July 2018, the Knesset voted to pass a law that defines Israel as “the national home of the Jewish people”, with Hebrew as its official language and Jerusalem – including the illegally occupied eastern side – as its capital.

The bill denies Palestinians any national rights and further entrenched racial discrimination against them by declaring that “the right to exercise national self-determination in the State of Israel is unique to the Jewish people”.

According to the Haifa-based Adalah legal rights centre, the law “transforms discrimination into a constitutional, systematic and institutional principle, and into a basic element of the foundations of Israeli law”.

The law states that Jewish settlement is “a national value” and that the state will “encourage and promote its establishment and consolidation” – essentially giving it carte blanche to settle more land in the occupied territories – the Golan Heights included, or in Israel proper.

Upholding the 2008 Citizenship Law

In July 2022, Israel’s Supreme Court ruled that the state can revoke citizenship over offences constituting a “breach of loyalty”, providing the government with legal mechanisms to strip Palestinians of their citizenship and fundamental rights and deport them, after rendering them stateless.

In August 2017, the Haifa District Court revoked the citizenship of Alaa Zayoud, a Palestinian citizen of Israel serving time in prison after being convicted of attempted murder. This was the first time an Israeli court has ruled that an individual’s citizenship be revoked, according to Adalah.

“There has never been a request to revoke the citizenship of a Jewish citizen, even when Jewish citizens were involved in serious and grave crimes,” Adalah noted, highlighting the case of Yigal Amir, the assassin of former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Israel’s Supreme Court rejected a request to revoke his citizenship in 1996, but upheld the ruling against Zayoud.

Law banning BDS supporters from entering Israel

In March 2017, parliament voted to ban any Palestinians or foreign nationals if they, or the organisations they belong to, publicly endorse the boycott of Israel or its illegal settlements.

The law, with its vague wording, also has implications for Palestinian residents of East Jerusalem whose partners live with them on Israeli military-issued permits or a temporary residence status.

If those spouses are vocal about supporting BDS – the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement – they could be vulnerable to having their status or permits revoked based on their political opinions.

BDS is a campaign to push Israel into withdrawing from all occupied Palestinian and Arab territory, and to give its Palestinian citizens the same rights as its Jewish ones.

Benjamin Netanyahu open for talks to douse protests

Benjamin Netanyahu open for talks to douse protests

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says he is still “open for negotiations” on a key clause of his hard-right government’s controversial judicial reforms, as protests intensified ahead of final votes on the bill.
Israel has been rocked by a months-long wave of protests after the government unveiled in January plans to overhaul the ­judicial system that opponents say threaten the country’s democracy.
An Israeli parliamentary committee has already moved to limit the “reasonability” clause that ­allows the judiciary to strike down government decisions, in a marathon debate that ended late on Wednesday (Thursday AEST).
But Mr Netanyahu, on live TV on Thursday night, tried to reach out to protesters and critics who have rallied against the reforms.
“I’m Prime Minister to all of you … we are still trying to reach an agreement with the opposition,” he said.
“Even now there are efforts to reach an agreement on the reasonability clause. I really hope that the efforts will be successful, but even if not, my door remains open for negotiations.”
Mr Netanyahu paused the legislative process in March and launched cross-party talks over the issue, but opposition leaders Yair Lapid and Benny Gantz pulled out of the discussions.
In recent weeks, he launched a fresh political offensive to push through the reforms in parliament.
Protesters claim the judiciary reforms would turn Israel into a dictatorship, a charge Mr Netanyahu dismissed.
“Israel will continue to be democratic, liberal, and will protect the rights of all citizens,” he said. “This law will strengthen democracy.”
The bill is due for second and third readings in parliament on Monday after receiving approval from parliament’s law committee.
If approved by the full parliament, it would be the first major component of the government’s proposed legal overhaul to ­become law.

Protesters have kept up pressure on the government, and on Thursday launched rallies in several cities across the country, ­including Jerusalem.
Hundreds were marching from Tel Aviv, the country’s commercial hub, to the seat of parliament in Jerusalem.
“We are marching to Jerusalem to protect our country from becoming a dictatorship,” said protester Yair Palti, who participated in the multi-day march that began early on Wednesday.
“We are a democracy but now we are already on the edge of dictatorship.”
Protesters set off every morning before taking a long midday break then resuming their march at 5.30pm.
They plan to reach Jerusalem by Saturday night and camp near the Knesset as MPs vote on Monday on the controversial bill.
The judicial reforms have split the nation and sparked one of the biggest protest movements in ­Israel’s history, with weekly demonstrations often drawing tens of thousands.
Other proposed reforms include giving the government a greater say in the appointment of judges.
The government, which includes Mr Netanyahu’s extreme-right and ultra-Orthodox Jewish allies, argues that the changes are necessary to ensure a better balance of power.
Some critics of Mr Netanyahu, who is fighting corruption charges in court, have argued he was seeking to undermine a judicial system he has accused of targeting him unfairly for political reasons.

AFP

This Is the Most Important War in Israel’s History, Says the Leader of the Protest Movement

This Is the Most Important War in Israel’s History, Says the Leader of the Protest Movement

At the end of my meeting with Avi Himi, I ask him if there’s anything he would like to add, something important he wants to have included in the interview. His reply leaves us both with misty eyes.

“It’s important for me to say that both my wife, Hana, and I, each of us with our respective background – we’re both from the Israeli periphery, Mizrahim whose parents came here from Morocco – are grateful to the State of Israel, which made it possible for us to accomplish everything we dreamed of accomplishing. No one ever put obstacles in our way. We fulfilled our dreams in this country, we both moved ahead in their career, we raised marvelous daughters, and all of it was made possible in this place, which we love so much.

“Our lives are on the line: If the new government’s revolution is successful, it means that our children will not be able to live in this country, and therefore I feel obligated to pay a price in order to stop this madness. You have left us no choice. We don’t have a lot of time. The weeks ahead are critical, just as the War of Independence was critical.”

By January 21, last Saturday night, it was already clear: Himi, the head of the Israel Bar Association, had become the outstanding leader of the protest against the program of regime change in Israel. In his speech to the masses that packed the Azrieli intersection in Tel Aviv, he fired up the crowd with simple, clear words, with straightforward statements and impressive determination. “Cry, the beloved country!” he bellowed, and the crowd responded, “For shame! A disgrace!”

Himi does not fit the stereotypes of identity politics in Israel; he’s not easily subsumed in any of the tiresomely familiar categories. But that’s not the primary reason he has emerged as a hero of the protest movement. What sets him apart is his clear vision of the danger that lurks in the government’s plans, his sharp call for action and the fact that he is truly willing to make the greatest sacrifice that can be made for the sake of Israeli democracy. His life.

“People lost their lives and their loved ones for the sake of the state in Israel’s wars and military operations,” Himi told Haaretz in an interview just days after his speech last Saturday. “We have lost what is most precious to us. From my point of view, democracy is also a worthy cause to die for. We will not live in a dictatorship, period. Safeguarding democracy is as important as safeguarding the country’s borders. It’s even more important than physical borders, because it’s our spirit, our soul. I see this struggle as parallel to our war against outside enemies.

“These are domestic enemies,” he continues, “and they are no less serious a threat than any other enemy. The prices that I am paying because of my decision to struggle pales in the face of my obligation to do battle against this overthrow of our system.” Himi says that he has been on the receiving end of many telephone death threats, and also that he has lost clients because of his activism.

What should citizens do in order to struggle against the coup?

“Every citizen bears the same responsibility, and has the same ability to influence as I have, I don’t have greater weight. First of all, to come to demonstrations across the country. And then to raise the stakes, and shut down the economy. We will not go to work, we will not send our children to school, we shall all assemble in the streets – children, women, men, the elderly, whoever can – we will block roads, we will all come to the Knesset. A million people will arrive and declare that our democracy is untouchable.”

And those who have influence, such as the head of the Histadrut labor federation, the trade unions, university presidents, top figures in high-tech and so on?

“I expect all of them to understand that this war is the most important we’ve had in the country’s 75 years of existence, and therefore I call on all of them to join.”

What should elected officials from the opposition do?

“To work to have [Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu declared ‘incapacitated.’ A serving prime minister who is facing trial on three indictments cannot be part of an overhaul of the judicial system, and therefore can also no longer continue to serve as prime minister. The attorney general must take the lead in this legal procedure. She is a courageous, serious woman, a good attorney general. The unavoidable move – given that the prime minister does not understand the conflict-of-interest agreement in accordance with which he is supposed to be acting – is to declare him incapacitated. After that it will be possible to work on new coalition alliances.”

But the coalition heads have already said that declaring the prime minister incapacitated would constitute an illegal removal from office.

“These developments illustrate the intensity of the attempt to terrorize the system. These are patterns of behavior bordering on the criminal; misbegotten and dangerous moves by a ruthless, fear-stricken, power-intoxicated government.”

Himi, 63, was one of the first public personalities to foresee what is currently taking place. Since 2019, when he became the president of the bar association, the professional guild representing the country’s attorneys, he has been shouting from every platform at his disposal his opposition to what he sees as the crazed idea of weakening the courts, when that notion was still only a threatening theory.

“I know the plans of [Religious Zionism MK] Simcha Rothman, [Finance Minister] Bezalel Smotrich and [Justice Minister] Yariv Levin. How did I first get to know about them? One day [in 2020], all the lawyers in Israel received a fancy, glossy pamphlet put out by the Kohelet Policy Forum, containing a detailed explanation of why the Israel Bar Association should be shut down. We, who represent the citizenry in the face of the government – they want to nationalize our profession, so that the government would decide who will be the head and members, and we won’t be independent anymore. Our task is to preserve the rule of law and human rights. I am a criminal lawyer who does battle against the prosecution as the representative of the state, against the Justice Ministry, against the National Security Ministry, against the harsh decrees of the Finance Ministry. They want to put someone like me under their control, make me a puppet to serve them rather than the citizens?”

Already by then the “black robes protest” had appeared. A large group of lawyers, among them leading people in the field in Israel, protested against what they saw as the dangers inherent in the “override clause.” Himi is one of the leaders of the robes protest, and thus the Israel Bar Association – which hadn’t yet recovered from the blow it suffered because of the behavior of the former president, Effi Naveh, who resigned under a cloud – became a central voice in the struggle.

There’s criticism within the bar association itself of your protest activity.

“The face of the bar association is like the face of the generation. People claim my activity is political, but I say that it’s precisely my critics who are coming from a political position. Under the Bar Association Law, our mission is to fight on behalf of the rule of law and for human rights. And that is what I am doing. I respect other voices, that’s part of the democratic discourse, but from my perspective, I am an apolitical head of the association who is working for the lawyers and the citizens of Israel.”

He adds, “We are in such a complex period. In terms of security, the economy, there is a worldwide inflationary crisis, violence is rife in Israeli society, we have poverty to deal with. And the destruction of the judicial system is what they’re starting with? There are a thousand-and-one issues that relate to the citizenry as such that don’t interest them. They started with a judicial coup so that they could appoint convicted criminals and cronies to key positions. I ask myself: How do the citizens fail to grasp that they are doing all these things in order to become the exclusive masters?”

How can that be explained to the public?

“By saying clearly that the citizenry will be directly harmed by this legal coup. Shula from Dimona, Varda from Hadera, Moshe from Hatzor Haglilit – they will be the ones who are hurt. All the markers that political scientists point to in the rise of dictatorships are visible here, one after the other: kowtowing to the leader, the fact that the more one kowtows the more one moves ahead, the destruction of the judiciary, the crushing of the media. By all scientific criteria, we are marching toward a dictatorship.”

Every person is invited to live here with his worldview – Haredim, Orthodox, LGBTQ people, Arabs – and I will fight so that everyone can live as he chooses. But the foundation is a constitution based on the country’s Declaration of Independence.

With the machine of lies that the government is wielding, will the public understand?

“Definitely. The polling shows that opinion is shifting against them. They wanted one fell swoop, and the people of the protest conveyed to the public what that would mean. If you walk on the streets you will see a great many worried people, and not only in Tel Aviv. I know that with certainty, because people are calling me from all over the country who are fearful of the governmental coup. We are a democratic people. I don’t think people here will forgo democracy so easily.”

Even among opponents of Levin’s plan, there are some who say that the judicial system needs a reform.

“I want all the trouble makers and tongue cluckers who claim that ‘we need a reform’ to explain to me how the reform they are proposing will help the people. Write down something that it’s important for me to say: People talk scornfully about the so-called constitutional revolution fomented by Justice Aharon Barak. But what did he do? He gave the right of standing to anyone who believed he had been harmed, to come to the Supreme Court and stand against the state before the High Court of Justice. Is there anything more just and enlightened than that? What is wrong with that, Lord in heaven? It’s the essence of universal values of justice and equality. He led a revolution in our benefit, they are executing a regime overthrow for themselves. The public has to understand the disparity between the two actions.”

Himi adds that he believes “wholeheartedly that the Supreme Court is the beacon of democracy. It is the fortress of human rights. When ultra-Orthodox, Mizrahi schoolgirls weren’t admitted to Haredi schools run by Ashkenazim, who solved the problem? Did Shas solve the problem? Did Bibi solve the problem? No way – it was the Supreme Court [sitting as the High Court] that solved the problem. I am married to a feminist woman and I am raising two feminist daughters. From our point of view, the High Court decision [in 1995] in the Alice Miller case not only made it possible for her to become an air force pilot: It opened all the combat professions to women. It brought down barriers.

“That’s the society we want to live in, not a society in which women will be compelled to sit at the back of the bus and female soldiers will only be secretaries because of men’s twisted worldview. When I examine each of the 22 laws that our Supreme Court declared unconstitutional, I am proud. I am proud to live in this country, which such laws that were annulled.”

No bowing down

Avi Himi was born and raised in the lower-class Northern Galilee town of Kiryat Shmona. He is the youngest of eight siblings, five of whom were born in Morocco, before the family’s immigration. His parents, who were poor and uneducated, had a store that sold fish and poultry. The family lived in an apartment of 54 square meters (580 sq. ft.), together with a grandmother. Until the age of 12 he shared a bed with his brothers.

He speaks warmly and with great appreciation about his parents, who despite the material dearth, raised eight fine children with no emotional wants. “My parents educated us not to bow down to politicians – and not to rabbis, either, because the connection to God doesn’t need mediators,” he says, recalling his childhood. “In the simple home I grew up in, my parents knew that ours was a democratic, egalitarian country, one that would enable anyone who wanted to, to bloom. We had no money, but we did have the opportunity to acquire an education. Thanks to that, each of the eight brothers and sisters reached the place they dreamed of.”

From early on, it was clear that Himi was clever and a good student, so at 14 he was sent to the prestigious Reali school in Haifa and resided in a military boarding school in the city. He likes to recount how, on the first day of studies, everyone introduced themselves and he grasped the differences between him and the others. One student related that he had just returned with his family from a sabbatical abroad, another said his father was the director of a hospital department. When Himi’s turn came he told his classmates that his father – who, as noted, sold fish and chicken – was “involved with denizens of the sea and winged creatures.”

He did his army service in the Golani infantry brigade, became an officer and at the time of his discharge, after six years, had reached the rank of captain. As he lights a cigarette, he relates with pride that three months ago, he was promoted to major. He insists on continuing to volunteer for reserve duty as a defense counsel (in the office of the Military Advocate General), though at his age it’s no longer called for. He attended law school at Tel Aviv University, working three different jobs in order to pay the tuition.

“In one of the jobs I did a night shift as a guard for Brinks,” he recalls. “I would finish the shift at 6 A.M., jump over the fence of the university, which was closed at that hour of the day, and sleep for two hours on the grass until classes began.”

He met his wife, whose name he speaks with obvious love, in Kiryat Shmona when they were teenagers. They were married immediately after his army service, and their first daughter was born while both were still pursuing higher education – he in law school, she studying first social work and later criminology. Their second daughter was born five years later. Hana is presently the dean of the Faculty of Consultation, Treatment and Educational Support at Beit Berl Academic College. In the past she worked for the nonprofit organization NATAL, the Israel Trauma and Resiliency Center, which provides various services, including psychological support, to victims of terrorism and war. The couple live in the central city of Rosh Ha’ayin. Tal, their elder daughter, is a clinical psychologist who lives in Paris and is the mother of a 5-year-old son. Noam, the younger one, is an events producer who lives in Tel Aviv. “The girls are adults, the grandchild is in Paris, so my wife and I are engaged only in activity on behalf of the country,” he says.

In the course of his career, Himi became one of Israel’s leading criminal lawyers. He has defended heads of crime organizations, among them Shalom Domrani, one of the most fabled crime bosses, has managed many highly publicized cases and his acquittal record is considered very high. In one case, he defended two members of a crime organization who in 2003 murdered a 16-year-old girl, Shaked Shalhov, from Ashkelon, during an attempt to assassinate a rival. The two were acquitted in Haifa District Court by reason of doubt, but the Supreme Court convicted them both on appeal, and they were sentenced to life in prison. “That was one of my most highly charged cases,” Himi notes.

In 2008, in the wake of the murder of criminal-defense attorney Yoram Hacham, Himi decided to change direction. Hacham, who had represented many crime families, was killed by a bomb planted in his car. Nearly a decade later, organized-crime boss Asi Abutbul, who had been one of Hacham’s clients, was accused of the murder. “Yoram Hacham’s murder shocked me,” Himi says. “The next day I decided not to represent people who belong to crime organizations.”

All the markers that point to in the rise of dictatorships are visible: kowtowing to the leader, the fact that the more one kowtows the more one moves ahead, the destruction of the judiciary, the crushing of the media.

But he does represent people accused of white-collar crimes. Among others, he represented Shlomo Benizri, a former cabinet minister from Shas, who was convicted of bribe-taking, breach of trust and obstruction of justice, and former Kiryat Malakhi Mayor Motti Malcha, who was convicted of sexual offenses.

You say you are opposed to government corruption – is that compatible with representing people like Benizri?

“Despite the charges against him, Rabbi Benizri and I developed deep ties of friendship. He is a smart and loving man, a fascinating conversationalist, and today devotes his life to helping others. My fondness and esteem for him only show how far my current campaign against the government’s plan is from being a political matter, and certainly not an ethnic one. The reform will hurt everyone and [undermine] humanitarian and universal values, no matter their religious background.”

Himi was also the defense counsel of one of the youths who burned to death a Palestinian teenager, Mohammed Abu Khdeir, in 2014. The youth was sentenced to 21 years in prison; he was the only one of the three defendants who was not given a life term (because he was seen as only assisting in the actual act of murder).

“That’s a case that reflects the brainwashing we’re undergoing here,” Himi says. “We have to set the value of equality as the most important one in our country. When your point of departure is that we are all equal and you raise your children to love humanity – incidents like that don’t happen. But in recent years what we are witnessing are hatred, incitement, schism, a war of people against their brethren. We must ask ourselves how we came to this pass, and especially how we can stop it. Here am I, Avi Himi, saying loud and clear that Arab and Jew are one, are brothers. We are equal.”

That’s an important statement, but for the past 55 years the Palestinians in the occupied territories have not known democracy.

“I always said that we need to ensure security arrangements and to separate from the Palestinians, because when we behave toward other people as if we are their masters, we sin against the Jewish ethos of respecting the stranger. I will say it clearly, though there are those who would advise me not to: The measures that the government wants to implement amount to the establishment of a halakhic state, the annexation of Judea and Samaria, with the final stage being an apartheid state. Religious Zionism is leading us to that place, which is a very dangerous one.”

Benighted government’

Himi says he “comes from a Likud environment,” adding, “They are flesh of my flesh and I am theirs. I remember how in childhood I went with my father and my siblings to hear Menachem Begin speak in the commercial center of Kiryat Shmona.”

It’s precisely against that background that he is especially angry at Likud. “The Likud ballot has the letters mem-het-lamed [‘Mahal’], the initials of the National Liberal Movement. They forgot the L and have remained with the M and the H, which [in Hebrew] are the initials for “benighted government.” That’s what’s left of them. I see unworthy MKs who insinuated themselves into the Likud’s slate and lost their self-respect. I don’t believe they all are in favor of what they’re calling a ‘reform,’ yet they are all silent. How can they look at themselves in the mirror?

“I say to my Mizrahi brethren: If anyone is pulling the wool over your eyes, it’s Likud. They have been in power since 1977, more or less, and what have they done for the Mizrahim? Menachem Begin launched Project Renewal in the underprivileged neighborhoods, and since then, nothing. What do we have in common with Yariv Levin? Has he even once done something to advance the cause of social equality for the people? Has [Religious Zionism MK Simcha] Rothman ever done anything for Mizrahi society? Has Smotrich ever improved the periphery?

The measures that the government wants to implement amount to the establishment of a halakhic state, the annexation of Judea and Samaria, with the final stage being an apartheid state.

“We don’t need paternalists, we don’t need to be helped, we know very well how to help ourselves. My dream is that a child in Hatzor Haglilit, or in Kiryat Shmona, or in Yeruham will receive the exact same education package as a child in Ra’anana or Ramat Aviv. That’s the whole story. Just a fishing rod, with which we will catch the most beautiful fish in the pond.”

How do you mobilize broad publics for protest?

“In all the demonstrations I’ve attended I’ve seen people from all across the social spectrum. It cuts across communities. People come in the cold and the rain from both the periphery and from the center of the country. There are those who have tried to create a narrative that these are demonstrations of leftists and Ashkenazim. First of all, I despise that discourse; and second, it’s simply not true. The Mizrahi public is smart and it is showing up in its masses. One of the reasons I embarked on this struggle is that I understood the need, and especially the power, of proper explanation. People are buckling under the burden of routine life and don’t have time to go into things deeply, so you need to explain. What’s important is for the person who hears the words to understand, because the issues are simple.”

Things sound simple from the other side, too. For example, when it’s claimed that in the Dery decision [disqualifying Arye Dery from serving as a cabinet minister, following his conviction a year ago on tax-evasion charges – the second time he was convicted of white-collar crimes], the High Court nullified the votes of the 400,000 Shas voters.

“It’s Dery himself who hurt them. He and his friends in the government are experts at bringing hot potatoes to the court so they can attack it later. Mr. Dery, in your last trial, you declared to the court that you would resign [from politics], and because of that fictitious resignation, the court did not categorize your offenses as crimes of ‘moral turpitude’ [which, if imposed, would have kept him out of politics for seven years]. So, before you run in an election, go to the Central Elections Committee and check whether you are entitled to head a party.

“The court did not hurt your voters, all it did was to set a logical and reasonable norm, one that the majority of the public agrees with: that a twice-convicted [criminal] offender cannot serve in the government of Israel. You hurt the voters when you committed corruption offenses. In Israel, a convicted criminal cannot be a taxi driver or a security guard in a school, so how can he serve as a cabinet minister or deputy prime minister? Inconceivable.”

What do you think about the recent calls to establish a broad committee to discuss the judicial overhaul?

“For us to talk to them [the government], they have to declare a cease-fire, because you can’t negotiate under fire. We need to say clearly that the values of the Declaration of Independence must be the basis for a dialogue. Only if they agree with us on that will there be anything to talk about. Until then, there must be a determined struggle. A revolution [mahapeikha] is for the good of the people, a coup [hafikha] is against the people. They are currently carrying out a coup, whose entire goal is to debilitate the judiciary so that they will be able to carry out all the other things they have planned: to shut down the free media, to take over culture, restrict public transportation and more. We will talk to them only if the coalition says, ‘All right, we understand. It was too fast, sharp and evil. We are taking a pause and establishing an objective committee, which might produce different results.”

You concluded your speech last Saturday with a call for Israel to write a constitution.

 

“The people of Israel has to understand that we must broaden the common denominator between us, and that that is possible only on a basis of shared and indisputable civil values. Every person is invited to live here with his worldview – Haredim, Orthodox, LGBTQ people, Arabs – and I will fight so that everyone can live as he chooses. But the foundation is a constitution based on the country’s Declaration of Independence.”

You have already announced that you will not seek a second term as president of the bar association. Do you intend to enter politics?

“I don’t have any such plan. After I conclude my term this June, I want to contribute to society by helping organizations in the nonprofit sphere – for at-risk youth and disabled children. That’s what’s important for me. [In 2008, Himi established an NGO called “A Future for the Young,” which assists addicted and violent adolescents.] The way politics works in Israel today, I would have to forgo my values and my beliefs to be active politically. I esteem everyone who enters public life for the sake of the people and democracy, because they are truly making a great sacrifice. It’s no easy thing to be a public person in Israel who wants to do good.

“They are saying that a judicial overhaul is necessary because the public has increasingly less confidence in the judiciary,” Himi adds. “If that’s the parameter, then we actually need an overhaul of the government, because the public’s confidence in politicians stands at minus 10. In Israel we have succeeded economically, in security, we have reached outer space, the media here is highly developed, as is high-tech – it’s a glorious country. But we have one big failure: our politicians.”

Opinion | Zionist Protesters in Tel Aviv Forgot Their Palestinian Neighbors

Opinion | Zionist Protesters in Tel Aviv Forgot Their Palestinian Neighbors

Once again I did not go to Habima Square, or to Kaplan Street, to join the demonstrations. My legs did not carry me there and my heart kept me from taking part in a protest that is largely justified, but which is not my protest.

A demonstration covered in a sea of blue-and-white flags, as if to prove itself and to protect its participants, while the flags of the other people that live in this land are prohibited or gathered into a narrow ghetto on a mound of dirt at the edge of the square, as in the previous demonstration, cannot be my demonstration.

An all-Jewish, one-nation demonstration in a clearly binational state cannot be a demonstration for anyone who seeks equality or justice, which are among the key words of this protest but remain hollow within it.

Hollow is the talk of “freedom, equality and quality government” by the organizers of one demonstration in Tel Aviv; no less hollow is the talk of “fighting for democracy” by those of the other. There is not and will never be “freedom, equality and quality government” in an apartheid state, nor is there “fighting for democracy” when a blind eye is turned to apartheid.

Some of the Jews of this country are now outraged in the face of a concrete threat to their rights and liberty. It is good that they have been shaken into civil action, but their rights and liberty, even after they are curtailed, will remain those of the privileged, of the inherent Jewish supremacy. Those who assent to it, in speech or in silence, take the name of democracy in vain. Silence about it is silence about apartheid. Participation in these demonstrations of hypocrisy and double standards is unacceptable.

The sea of Israeli flags at these demonstrations is meant as apology in the face of the right’s questioning of the camp’s loyalty and patriotism. We are Zionists, therefore we are loyal, the demonstrators say. The Palestinians and the Israeli Arabs can wait until we finish things among us. It’s forbidden to mix issues, as if it were possible not to mix them. Once again, the center and the left fall dead before the accusations of the right, mumbling and apologizing; the purity of the flag tarnished them far more than the accusations did.

Once again, this camp is shown to exclude Palestinians and their flag no less than the right does. How can one participate in such a demonstration? There is not and cannot be a demonstration on democracy and equality, on freedom and even on quality government, in an apartheid format in an apartheid state, while ignoring apartheid’s existence.

The flag was chosen as a symbol because it is a Zionist protest, but it cannot be a Zionist demonstration for democracy and also a just demonstration. An ideology that engraves on its flag the supremacy of one people over another cannot preach justice before it changes the basis of its ideology. The Star of David is sinking, as the cover illustration of Friday’s Hebrew Haaretz Magazine demonstrated so wrenchingly, but its sinking is inevitable as long as Israel’s flag is the flag of one of the two nations with a claim to it.

Palestinian blood has been spilled like water in recent days. Not a day goes by without innocents being killed: a gym teacher who tried to save an injured person in his yard; two fathers, in two different places, who tried to protect their sons, and a 14-year-old son of refugees – all in one week. How can a protest ignore this, as if it weren’t happening, as if the blood were water and the water were blessed rain, as if it has nothing to do with the face of the regime?

Can you imagine if Jews were attacked every day or two? Would the protest have ignored them? The occupation is farther than ever from ending; it has become an annoying fly that needs to be silenced. Anyone who mentions it is a troublemaker who must be kept away; even the left doesn’t want to hear about it anymore.

“Stop the coup d’etat,” call the announcements, with pathos that seems to have been taken from the French Revolution. But there is no revolution in an apartheid state, if it continues to be an apartheid state. Even if all the demands of the protesters are realized, the Supreme Court carried aloft, the attorney general exalted and the executive branch returned to its rightful stature, Israel will remain an apartheid state. So what is the point of this protest? To enable us to revel once more in being “the only democracy in the Middle East.”

Huge protest in Israel over rightwing government’s judicial changes

Huge protest in Israel over rightwing government’s judicial changes

An estimated 100,000 people took to the streets of Tel Aviv on Saturday night in what protesters described as a “fight for Israel’s destiny” over sweeping judicial changes proposed by the new far-right government.

Israel’s longtime prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, returned to office last month at the helm of a coalition of conservative and religious parties that make up the most right-wing government in the country’s history.

The new administration has accused Israel’s supreme court of leftwing bias and overstepping its authority. It is seeking to curb the court’s powers by severely restricting its ability to overturn laws and government decisions and giving the Knesset more control over judicial appointments.

The Tel Aviv protest, along with smaller demonstrations in Jerusalem, Haifa and Beersheba, were sparked by fears that the far-reaching proposals undermine democratic norms. Since Israel has no formal constitution, the supreme court plays an important role in keeping government ministers in check.

Netanyahu – himself on trial on corruption charges, which he denies – has defended the plans. His opponents say the proposed changes could help the prime minister evade a conviction or even see the case dropped altogether.

Israeli opposition leader and former prime minister, Yair Lapid, as well as several other figures from across the country’s political spectrum, addressed demonstrators in central Tel Aviv on Saturday as the crowd waved the blue and white national flag and held placards reading “No to dictatorship”.

“We have here in the streets representatives of many groups who don’t usually come out to protest, but they are here, even sworn rightwingers,” said one speaker, the celebrated novelist David Grossman.

“This immensely diverse group is prepared to put aside its differences, and fight this existential fight … In its 75th year, Israel is in a fateful struggle for its character, for its democracy and for the status of its rule of law.”

Noya Matalon, 24, a law student at Tel Aviv University, said: “The last big protest movement in Israel was about taking Netanyahu down, but it’s not a matter of right and left any more. Everyone – Arabs, Jews, even people who agree we need some reforms to the judicial system – everyone is saying they are scared.”

The musician Ollie Danon, 23, cancelled a show scheduled for Saturday night so he and audience members could join the protests instead. “There’s a crisis in engagement in politics here after five elections in a short space of time. There was a sense it was just all about Bibi,” he said, using Netanyahu’s nickname.

“This is bigger than Bibi now, though; it’s an emergency situation. I believe the supreme court does need reform. Its rulings usually support the occupation [of the Palestinian territories], and somehow now it’s the left wing who are out protesting to defend it. It’s all absurd.”

Saturday’s gatherings build on similar demonstrations over recent weeks, including one in Tel Aviv last weekend that drew 80,000 people, nationwide protests by students, and one outside a Tel Aviv court. Roee Neuman, one of the organisers, said more street protests are planned, as well as strike action.

“I am optimistic things can change, even if I am not optimistic about the state of Israel at the moment. We are going to increase our efforts: we are coordinating strikes in sectors that would never normally get involved, like lawyers, doctors and the tech industry. We can block roads.

“It’s difficult to predict what will happen, but I think if it starts hitting the economy they will have to listen.”

In addition to the growing protest movement, the prime minister has faced pressure from Israel’s attorney general after a ruling last week that disqualified key ally Aryeh Deri from holding a government post because of a conviction of tax offences.

Netanyahu was forced to fire the Shas party leader during Sunday’s cabinet meeting, declaring as he did so that “the high court decision ignores the will of the nation”.

The coalition also faced an early test on Friday in the form of a disagreement between cabinet members over dismantling a new Jewish settlement in the occupied West Bank.

Thousands of Israelis protest against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new government

Thousands of Israelis protest against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new government

Tens of thousands of Israelis have gathered in Tel Aviv to protest plans by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new government to overhaul the judicial system, measures that opponents say imperil the country’s democratic foundation.

The protest followed another demonstration last week that also drew tens of thousands in an early challenge to Mr Netanyahu and his ultranationalist and ultra-Orthodox government — the most right-wing in Israeli history.

The government says a power imbalance has given judges and government legal advisers too much sway over lawmaking and governance.

Mr Netanyahu has pledged to press on with the changes despite the opposition.

Protesters filled central streets in the seaside metropolis, raising Israeli flags and banners that read “Our Children will not Live in a Dictatorship” and “Israel, We Have A Problem.”

“This is a protest to defend the country,” said opposition leader and former prime minister Yair Lapid, who joined the protest.

“People came here today to protect their democracy.”

“All generations are concerned. This is not a joke,” said Lior Student, a protester. “This is a complete redefinition of democracy.”

Other protests took place in the cities of Jerusalem, Haifa and Beersheba.

Legal troubles plague Netanyahu’s government

In addition to the protests, pressure has built up on Mr Netanyahu’s government after the country’s attorney general asked him to fire a key cabinet ally following a Supreme Court ruling that disqualified him from holding a government post because of a conviction of tax offences.

While Mr Netanyahu was expected to heed the court ruling, it only deepened the rift in the country over the judicial system and the power of the courts.

Israel’s Attorney-General has formally charged Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in a series of corruption cases, which the embattled leader says is tantamount to a coup.

Earlier this week, Mr Netanyahu, who is on trial for corruption, vowed to continue with the judicial overhaul plans despite the protests.

Opponents say the changes could help Mr Netanyahu evade conviction in his corruption trial, or make the court case disappear altogether.

On Friday, the coalition was put to the test after a disagreement between cabinet members over the dismantling of an unauthorised settlement outpost in the West Bank.

Defence Minister Yoav Galant, a member of Mr Netanyahu’s Likud party, ordered the removal of the outpost, upsetting a pro-settlement cabinet member who had issued a directive to postpone the eviction pending further discussions.

Thousands protest Israel’s justice moves

Thousands protest Israel’s justice moves

Thousands of Israelis have taken to the streets to protest plans by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s new government that opponents say threaten democracy and freedoms.

The protesters gathered in the central city of Tel Aviv days after the most right-wing and religiously conservative government in the country’s 74-year history was sworn in.

“The settler government is against me,” read one placard. Another banner read, “Housing, Livelihood, Hope.” Some protesters carried rainbow flags.

The protest was led by left-wing and Arab members of the Israeli parliament, the Knesset. They contend that proposed plans by the new Cabinet will hinder the judicial system and widen societal gaps.

The left-wing protesters slammed Justice Minister Yariv Levin, who on Wednesday unveiled the government’s long-promised overhaul of the judicial system that aims to weaken the country’s Supreme Court.

Critics accused the government of declaring war on the legal system, saying the plan will upend Israel’s system of checks and balances and undermine its democratic institutions by giving absolute power to the new governing coalition.

“We are really afraid that our country is going to lose the democracy and we are going to a dictatorship just for reasons of one person which wants to get rid of his law trial,” said Danny Simon, 77, a protester from Yavne, south of Tel Aviv.

He was referring to Netanyahu, who was indicted on corruption charges in 2021, allegations that he has denied.

Protesters also called for peace and co-existence between Jews and Arab residents of the country.

“We can see right now many laws being advocated for against LGBTQ, against Palestinians, against larger minorities in Israel,” said Rula Daood of “Standing Together,” a grassroots movement of Arabs and Jews. “We are here to say loud and clear that all of us, Arabs and Jews and different various communities inside of Israel, demand peace, equality and justice.”

Theme: Overlay by Kaira